I just read about the NRA press conference in response to the Newtown school massacre. Wayne LaPierre and his organization want school staff to carry guns.
Great! I’m as much for killing child-killers as the next guy. I even wrote a poem about it, “The Killers of Children, ” years ago But on reflection I see that the NRA has not gone far enough.
Think about it: It’s 2014. Teachers have guns. The principal has a gun; the secretaries and maintenance folks have guns. Sig and Glock are right up there with Dr. Seuss and Shakespeare. But what are the spoilsport nutjobs and terrorists thinking? The place is well-defended. Maybe even my Bushmaster and 50 rounds won’t do the trick. Better get seriously locked and loaded!
So what can those malefactors reach for? RPGs? A tank? Well if he or she or any citizen does, they would be breaking the law. But that’s wrong. The right to bear arms doesn’t say what kind. Maybe in 1789 a well-ordered militia could make do with rifles. Modern assault weapons have come a long way, but not far enough for the 21st Century.
The NRA should immediately change its name to NHAHA, the National Heavy Artillery Helps Association. It should launch a full-bore lobbying and publicity campaign — so that the next time there’s a pitched battle anywhere, the average citizen will have a fighting chance at self-defense.
Yes, it could get ugly.But it’s already ugly: They want to take away our guns. They want to decide what arms (maybe just our own two hands!) we have a right to bear.
Countries that discuss what kinds of weapons they should be allowed, sign treaties, are losers. But Bin Laden was ahead of his time. He taught us that Freedom is nothing without Power — and the meaning of The Right to Bear Airliners.
2 responses to “The Right to Bear Airliners”
Susan Livingston
December 22nd, 2012 at 15:16
I was with you 100% until you affirmed the myth that Osama bin Laden deployed the plane(s) that (pretended to) crumble the WTC (and other buildings). However, there’s another angle to pursue. Do you think teachers will bear arms just to keep their jobs? (Would you? I wouldn’t!) Do you think parents will continue to send their kids to an armed encampment where they are likely to get shot for triggering (excuse the expression) the teacher? I don’t! I wouldn’t! Would you? (Well, I guess the JROTC parents will.)
So stop voting for bond issues to “support” public education. It isn’t what you think! It isn’t what you want! It’s FUBAR. Let it go. The timing is perfect; the infrastructure is crumbling anyway, and No Child Left Behind is still hard at work exacerbating fiscal disparity. We can do better. We MUST stop warehousing our children!
davichon
December 22nd, 2012 at 16:21
ALtho I’m not a member of that “myth” culture, it does not matter for the purposes of this post. I am not looking for cheers from “agreers” or to convince those who putatively do not, because the post is not an assertion of facts or opinions. Just a particular kind of cri du coeuer or whatever the French is.